Promissory estoppel
Promissory estoppel is an equitable doctrine which in some instances can stop a person going back on a promise which is not supported by consideration. Promissory estoppel was developed by an obiter statement by Denning J (as he then was) in Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees Ltd [1947] KB 130 (Case summary). Denning J based the doctrine on the decision in Hughes v Metropolitan Railway (1876-77) L.R. 2 App. Cas. 439 (Case summary). The House of Lords affirmed the existence of promissory estoppel in contract law in Tool Metal Manufacturing v Tungsten [1955] 1 WLR 761 (Case summary).
Requirements of promissory estoppel:
A pre-existing contract or legal obligation which is then modified
There must be a clear an unambiguous promise
Change of position
It must be inequitable to allow the promisor to go back on their promise
Revision games and quizzes
~~ Find interactive games and quizzes on contract law ~~
~~Take a quiz on promissory estoppel ~~
~~ Try a word search on promissory estoppel ~~
~~ Play hangman on promissory estoppel ~~
1. A pre-existing contractual or legal obligation which is then modified:
Combe v Combe [1951] 2 KB 215 Case summary
2. A clear and unambiguous promise.
This may be implied through conduct:
Woodhouse A.C. Israel Cocoa Ltd. v. Nigerian Product Marketing Co. Ltd. [1972] AC 741 Case summary
3. Change of position:
Alan v El Nasr [1972] 2 WLR 800 Case summary
4. It must be inequitable to allow the promisor to go back on their promise:
D & C Builders v Rees [1966] 2 WLR 28 Case summary